BY MICHAEL S. JOHNSON | JUL 18
A year ago, after the Charleston killings, I wrote:
“I don’t know how we ever get to that national conversation about race that for some reason is the ultimate, if unachievable goal of so many. My friend, the late Bill Gavin, told me years ago that there is no good outcome from a conversation in which two sides do not trust the motivation of the other. And regrettably, those individuals usually thought to be the best to conduct a conversation about race—activists, politicians, academics—are those who seem to question each others’ motivation the most often. They usually cannot extract the politics and prejudice, the suspicion and ulterior motives from their own discourse.”
I write about much that does not stand the test of time, but this does. One year later, we are no closer to honest discourse. Continue reading
