State of the Union: Not All Should Go To Waste

 

BY MICHAEL S. JOHNSON  |  JAN 14

President Obama’s final State of the Union address, like its six predecessors, will not be remembered for long. Obama is in good company. Most recent Presidents and their spin doctors have tried to make the State of the Union much more than the Constitution intended and usually failed.

As messages go, a good share of President Obama’s  were not believable. He tried in vain, and maybe some desperation, to define international terrorism as a problem, but not a crisis. He tried in vain to preach the gospel of renewed economic vitality to millions of unemployed, underemployed, underpaid American workers, plus another 46 million living in or around the poverty level, plus more millions watching their retirement drift off into a foggy future of unknown depth and direction. The next day the stock market took another deep dive. The most egregious message related to how well we are treating our returning military and veterans. Veterans, in particular, have been badly mistreated at veterans facilities all across the country. Continue reading →

State of the Union, 2016 Edition

BY JOHN FEEHERY
JAN 12  |  Reprinted from TheFeeheryTheory.com

Donald Trump is leading the Republican polls in Iowa and New Hampshire. Bernie Sanders is leading in the Republican polls in the same states.

You tell me if the State of the Union is strong.

The good news is we live in America and it’s a lot better than living in China or Europe.

At least in America, we are free to achieve our dreams, even if that means sitting on the couch and playing Grand Theft Auto all day. Continue reading →

Iowa Caucuses

BY RICH GALEN
JAN 7 | Reprinted from Mullings.com

All of the posturing. All of the spinning. All of the punditry. All of the knowing glances among the political pros will mean nothing in about 25 days when the good people of Iowa trudge out, certainly in the cold, and maybe through the snow, to their neighborhood caucuses on February 1.

We will know – or we will think we know – who won on both the Republican and Democratic sides by about 11 PM Central Time. Continue reading →

On Mike Oxley

BY JOHN FEEHERY
JAN 6  |  Reprinted from TheFeeheryTheory.com

I became Ian Baker Finch when playing golf with Mike Oxley.

To clarify: Ian Baker Finch was the former British Open winner who would later lose his ability to hit a tee shot and would become a famous broadcaster.

Mike Oxley became famous in the financial world for Sarbanes-Oxley, legislation passed after Enron, MCI and a variety of other big companies went belly-up after conducting financial shenanigans. Continue reading →

Governing: Past and Future

BY MICHAEL S. JOHNSON  |  JAN 6

Another year is in front of us, and with it the ritualistic adoration of resolutions, promises, and agendas.

In politics, promises are king. They rule the  rhetoric, produce prolific, big block headlines, raise expectations, generate motion, and usually, accomplish nothing. It is because they are ritualistic that they survive.

Agendas are similar. They are just something we have to have at the onset of each new day, week, month, year, and millennia.  Continue reading →

Saudi v. Iran v. Bahrain v. Israel v. Syria v. Iraq v. Sunnis v. Shiites v. Putin v. Obama

BY RICH GALEN
JAN 4 | Reprinted from Mullings.com

Welcome to the first workday of 2016 and maybe the first day of World War III.

The last two World Wars started when a couple of countries got into it and everyone else began to choose sides.

Over the weekend, the Saudi Arabian government executed 47 people including one senior Shiite cleric who had been an outspoken opponent of the Saudi rulers.

The Iranians immediately set fire to the Saudi Embassy in Tehran. The Saudis immediately emptied its embassy of diplomats, cut off diplomatic ties, and ordered the Iranian mission out of Riyadh within 48 hours. Continue reading →

The Super Rich Should Pay Their Damn Taxes

BY JOHN FEEHERY
DEC 29  |  Reprinted from TheFeeheryTheory.com

In a properly functioning democracy, politicians would work extra hard to make certain that the very, very wealthy would pay an appropriate amount of taxes.

In a dysfunctional political system, where the exceedingly wealthy (and by exceedingly wealthy, I mean billionaires and multi-millionaires), have an outsized access to the political class, closing down the tax loopholes seems to be damn near impossible.

The New York Times just published an expose about how the super-wealthy avoid paying taxes. “With inequality at its highest levels in nearly a century and public debate rising over whether the government should respond to it through higher taxes on the wealthy, the very richest Americans have financed a sophisticated and astonishingly effective apparatus for shielding Continue reading →

The Otto Caucus

BY JOHN FEEHERY
DEC 21  |  Reprinted from TheFeeheryTheory.com

Wanda: Was it shrewd? Was it good tactics or was it stupid?
Otto: Don’t call me stupid.
Wanda: Of course not! To call you stupid would be an insult to stupid people! I’ve known sheep that could out-wit you! I’ve worn dresses with higher IQ’s, but you think you’re an intellectual, don’t you ape?…. Let me correct you on a few things. Aristotle was not Belgian. The central message of Buddhism is not “Every Man for Himself.” And the London Underground is not a political movement. Those are all mistakes, Otto. I looked ’em up.”

I have been thinking about this great classic movie, “A Fish Called Wanda”, and Otto, played by Kevin Kline. Continue reading →

America First, Charles Lindbergh and Ted Cruz

BY JOHN FEEHERY
DEC 17  |  Reprinted from TheFeeheryTheory.com

As Europe was engulfed in its second violent, all-encompassing war of the 20th Century, America split into two camps.

Franklin Delano Roosevelt became increasingly concerned about the brutality of the Nazi regime, and he engaged in a campaign to guide the United States into an alliance with Great Britain.

Others were not interested in getting America involved in another European War.

Industrialists including Robert McCormick, the publisher of the Chicago Tribune, William Regnery, who will later become famous for becoming the publisher of conservative writers, Sterling Morton of the Morton Salt Company, and many others came together in opposition to Roosevelt’s efforts. Continue reading →

Last Debate of the Year

BY RICH GALEN
DEC 16 | Reprinted from Mullings.com

I have found some of the previous debates cringe-worthy, but as the candidates have been through this five times, been on the stump for months, have had to answer questions from both print and TV reporters almost daily, and have had time to cull their advisors to get to the ones who know what they’re talking about; last night’s was pretty good.

I agreed with whomever pointed out that listening to the three Senators debate the finer points of second degree amendments in years-ago immigration legislation that never became law is tedious for most of us. Continue reading →

The Lessons of Roth-Kemp

BY JOHN FEEHERY
DEC 16  |  Reprinted from TheFeeheryTheory.com

When Bruce Thompson and Jim Brady started selling a tax reform plan in the late 1970’s, they didn’t get into specifics or try to educate people on the intricacies of tax policy.

They stuck to big themes and creatively captured the attention of the media and the American people.

Thompson was the tax counsel for Delaware Senator Bill Roth and Brady was Roth’s mouthpiece and they were selling the legendary Roth-Kemp tax reform plan that would later become the central component of the Reagan economic agenda. Continue reading →

Debating Debates

BY B. JAY COOPER
DEC 14 | Reprinted from The Screaming Moderate (bjaycooper.com)

The cable news networks are cleaning up financially through the Republican presidential debates. The ratings are through the roof, which means the networks can charge more for the ads during those debates.

What useful information has come out of those debates to help a voter make a choice on a candidate is another question.

These “debates” usually involve a panel of questioners with the rules typically being something like: Candidates get one minute to answer the question and 30 seconds to rebut an attack on themselves. After that, it’s a free for all with candidates interrupting each other trying to get their share of air time – between the ads that interrupt the program. Continue reading →

Tactics, Not Vision

BY RICH GALEN
DEC 7 | Reprinted from Mullings.com

Put aside, for the moment, today’s date.

Last night, President Barack Obama delivered a speech that was as defensive in nature as President Jimmy Carter’s “national malaise” speech on July 15, 1979.

Carter never actually used that phrase, but it stuck nonetheless because of the tone he took:

“It is a crisis of confidence. It is a crisis that strikes at the very heart and soul and spirit of our national will. We can see this crisis in the growing doubt about the meaning of our own lives and in the loss of a unity of purpose for our nation.” Continue reading →

US Can’t Wait for Change

BY JOHN FEEHERY
NOV 30  |  Reprinted from TheFeeheryTheory.com

Originally published in The Hill

My dad died from Parkinson’s disease the day after Thanksgiving at a veterans home in Manteno, Ill., which is about 45 minutes to the southwest of Chicago.

That brought me home to Illinois to visit with my family and help with the arrangements. If you are looking for a poster child of all that is wrong with America, Illinois would be a good place to start.

Illinois is bankrupt. It doesn’t make payments to its local schools because it doesn’t have any money. Illinois has the lowest bond rating of any state in the union (Puerto Rico is not a state). The political class has betrayed my home state, mortgaging the future by postponing hard decisions for generations.  Continue reading →

Giving Thanks

BY MICHAEL S. JOHNSON  |  NOV 27

“Thank you for your service.”

It is an expression that rolls off the tongue. Thanking someone in uniform as they trek through an airport or walk down a sidewalk has become commonplace.

The expression can take many different forms, from a simple ‘thanks’ and maybe a handshake to a fireworks popping flyover, flag-waving spectacle at a professional football game.

It is certainly most often a gesture made in hopes of lifting the spirit of a service member, a tiny step forward to express appreciation for what a soldier has done for the country, whatever that might be, from suffering the horrors of warfare to shuffling papers at the Pentagon.

Continue reading →

Refugees

BY RICH GALEN
NOV 19 | Reprinted from Mullings.com

The other day I wrote a column in which I suggested “The easiest and safest approach [to dealing with terrorists hiding as refugees] is to close the border, TFN – ’til further notice.”

I am far from a Tea Party, ultra-conservative Republican. In fact, I call myself a Trotskyite Republican which doesn’t mean anything but is way more fun to say than “RINO.”

Still. Taking a bit more time to figure out what we want to do, and how we want to do it seems to make some sense. Continue reading →

Humanitarian, Terrorist Crises Bring Us To Our Knees…Again

BY MICHAEL S. JOHNSON  |  NOV 15

They are still counting the bodies in Paris: 129 dead, including a young college student from California, Nehomi Gonzalez, just 23. There were 362 wounded.

There were six simultaneous assaults in Paris by at least eight suicide commandos, seven of whom died and one apparently in jail in Belgium.

It was an internationally organized terrorist assault with effective command and control, accomplices in several countries (one assailant apparently made his way disguised as a refugee through Greece and Serbia). It was so unconscionable, uncivilized, but more tragically, no longer unimaginable. Continue reading →

America’s Existential Crisis

BY JOHN FEEHERY
NOV 13  |  Reprinted from TheFeeheryTheory.com

I wasn’t smart enough to major in Philosophy when I was in college.

I was never patient enough to wade through Hegal or willing to take the vow of poverty that seemed to be what waited for me at the end of the long arduous road to a Philosophy doctorate.

Philosophy majors crept into the news thanks to the Republican debate the other night. Continue reading →

No Hand Raising

BY RICH GALEN
NOV 02 | Reprinted from Mullings.com

Fred Thompson died over the weekend.

You’ve read the obits and know about his rural Tennessee roots, his work as the chief Republican lawyer on the Watergate Committee, his service as a U.S. Senator and, of course, as Arthur Branch, the fictional district attorney of New York on the TV show Law & Order.

I didn’t know Fred for most of his life. Like most of us, I knew of Fred. It was during the brief time of his campaign for President in the 2008 cycle. Continue reading →

Fixing Congress Requires More Than a New Speaker

BY MICHAEL S. JOHNSON  |  OCT 15

“We came here to get something done. We always lock horns. We always argue. We never agree. I think it is about time, for once in a long time, we find common ground and agree.

“I want to get something done that is achievable. I don’t want to keep talking grand bargains that never happen. I want to see where we can get something done that is achievable and go for that.”

Those are the words of Congressman Paul Ryan, the Wisconsin whiz who is now the sought-after candidate for Speaker of the House. Continue reading →